Nolofinwe
Full Member
The Kingdom of Nolofinwe
Posts: 132
|
Post by Nolofinwe on May 13, 2005 19:23:41 GMT -5
Mr. President, Mr. Vice President, Honorable Members of the Counsel of Law, Fellow Citizens: I have an issue of some personal importance to that I believe concerns all of the members of this Region. In November of 2004, the Free Scottish Nation of Nolofinwe was founded. And after several unsuccessful attempts to start a new region, the Nation was moved to the fairly new region of 0000000000 Christian Teens, and it was there that the Nation grew and prospered. With a growing population and economy, Nolofinwe was able to get a little involved in international affairs, including two wars and one massive humanitarian effort. In February of 2005 Nolofinwe and several other nations introduced the idea of regional government. Nolofinwe then drafted a regional constitution that was soon adopted. Soon afterward Nolofinwe ran for President along with Scotsbrund with New Canterbury as the campaign advisor. In early March these two nations retired from the race, Nolofinwe continued to exist in silence for several months and Scotsbrund vanished. Nolofinwe later became active once more. Later in March Nolofinwe and New Canterbury were charged with fraud and sentenced to various punishments. That charge was based on the fact that both nations had the same IP address, this was correct, but let me explain further. Allow me to take you back to the election. I (the founder and creator of Nolofinwe) became very preoccupied with other personal affairs going on the real world and could no longer maintain the campaign and could not responsibly hold the office of President should I have been elected, Scotsbrund was in the predicament but was willing to continue the race. So it was then that New Canterbury came up with a rather ingenious solution; he would continue the campaign and act in the place of Nolofinwe (thus the same IP address) with Scotsbrund. Several weeks later however Scotsbrund announced that she could no longer continue and requested that the race be conceded to Catopia, this was done almost immediately. Based on these facts I would like to request that the fraud case be reconsidered by the Counsel of Law. And should they find New Canterbury and I not guilty of the charge, I would like to request that New Canterbury and I be cleared of all charges. New Canterbury was merely doing what I believed was for the good of the Region and did not intend to commit any unconstitutional or unethical acts contrary to the laws of this Region. In closing I would like to affirm that I have no hard feelings with regards to the February election. I simply have grown tired of NS and do not intend to return. I appreciate you all and I look forward to your reply. I am, Respectfully yours, Nolofinwe Elensar
|
|
|
Post by Geberia on May 14, 2005 8:43:49 GMT -5
Well, I wasn't here in Feb. so I don't really know what happened. But I forgive you:-)
I guess this all teaches us a lesson to tell others what's happening before we do it.
|
|
|
Post by New Titania (TD) on May 14, 2005 11:27:19 GMT -5
Well, Nolof, I forgive you, as I always have, but this makes absolutely zero sense. You didn't concede the election until after election day. Also, you stated in the CoL case #1 that you and New Canterbury were the same person. How could you be busy and NC not? It sounds slightly skitzofrenic.
|
|
|
Post by Siko Michael on May 14, 2005 13:47:42 GMT -5
hmmmmm.......Confused=ME
|
|
|
Post by Armany on May 14, 2005 16:57:05 GMT -5
So, are you quitting NS, Nolof.? Your last paragraph kinda confused me.
|
|
|
Post by New Titania (TD) on May 16, 2005 19:36:17 GMT -5
I think he wants to run in the next election. Please correct me if I'm wrong, Nolof.
|
|
Nolofinwe
Full Member
The Kingdom of Nolofinwe
Posts: 132
|
Post by Nolofinwe on May 28, 2005 17:17:51 GMT -5
I do not wish to answer that question at this time, but I will keep you informed if I do indeed choose to run. But I doubt that I will. To answer your earlier question NT(TD), the reason "I" stated that "I" was the same person in case one was because that was not me! It was my friend who was running Nolof. when that statement was made. The person who's post you are reading now is the REAL Nolofinwe.... Clear as mud?
|
|
|
Post by GDL on May 28, 2005 17:51:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by New Titania (TD) on May 28, 2005 18:19:38 GMT -5
OK, Nolof, I've got one thing to say to you: PLEASE put your tongue back in your mouth! You stuck it out so many times I couldn't tell who was talking: you or my dog!!
Why didn't you inform us of this earlier?? If this was the case, you could have been found not guilty a LONG time ago by the CoL. Your delay in timing causes me to wonder whether or not this is a new addition to your story and whether it is fact or fiction.
TD
|
|
|
Post by Triphus (Titanian) on May 29, 2005 9:25:34 GMT -5
I understand everyone has freedom of speech, but please keep any insults to a minimum. The CoL is in an appeal case right now to decide this case. As Choco Bar has already stated please no comments in the actual case. If you have any comments that you wish to be heard you may post them here. Just please no "put downs."
Thank you, Titanian
|
|
|
Post by New Titania (TD) on May 29, 2005 20:38:01 GMT -5
Titanian, that was no "put down" but merely a message stating that Nolofinwe used the too much. Ok, maybe it wasn't the nicest thing to say, but I'm extremely confused on Nolofinwe's predicament.
|
|
|
Post by GDL on May 29, 2005 20:39:14 GMT -5
Am I aloud to give my opinion
|
|
|
Post by GDL on May 29, 2005 20:44:47 GMT -5
I think that he's faking it!!!! WHy wouldn't he of said anything about this earlier?
|
|
|
Post by Triphus (Titanian) on May 29, 2005 21:21:22 GMT -5
lol well GDL you sure come right out and say it. I can neither agree nor disagree, but i admire your bluntness
|
|
|
Post by GDL on May 29, 2005 21:23:31 GMT -5
I'll take that as a compliement. Well yall know me I tell people what I think about them. I've done it before and this is probably not the last time that i'll ever do it either.
|
|