|
|
Post by Armany on Mar 12, 2005 10:16:30 GMT -5
Maybe, maybe not. Depends on your perspective. Lincoln did indeed suspend the peoples' writ of habaeus corpus, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by GDL on Mar 12, 2005 10:18:39 GMT -5
Maybe, maybe not. Depends on your perspective. Lincoln did indeed suspend the peoples' writ of habaeus corpus, though. He did ecspecially during the early part of the war that's probably why the US almost lost |
|
|
|
Post by Armany on Mar 12, 2005 10:21:06 GMT -5
No comprendo? Why did the Union almost lose because of Lincoln's actions?
|
|
|
|
Post by GDL on Mar 12, 2005 10:45:33 GMT -5
I didn't nean intirely but it caused disloyalty wich is usually the down fall of a nation don't get me wrong he was a great PREZ!
|
|
|
|
Post by Armany on Mar 12, 2005 10:49:08 GMT -5
No, I didn't take it that way.  I kind of see what you're saying, but that only occurred in border states, and it did help save the Union. If he wouldn't have done that in Maryland, DC would have been surrounded. |
|
|
|
Post by GDL on Mar 12, 2005 10:58:48 GMT -5
yOU DO HAFT TO ADMIT THAT WOULD OF BEEN FAIRLY INTERESTING
|
|
